Aller au contenu

TIL - today I learnt...


Hayek's plosive

Messages recommandés

Every year, with rare exceptions like last year, shareholders receive a dividend, which according to the central bank amounts to CHF15 per year (and is not to exceed 6% of the share capital).

[..]

the SNB stock price has soared from 1,100 francs in July to 1750 francs last night

 

Donc le dividend yield est de 0.86%.

 

Ste daube.

Lien vers le commentaire

Bah sta dire que la SNB niveau potentiel de croissance c'est un peu naze.

 

Il faut plutôt voir la SNB comme un genre d'énorme hedge fund. (Ce qui est plutôt naze aussi, vu les performances récentes de la plupart de ces fonds)

Lien vers le commentaire

TIL:

 

tumblr_oew4gly7HK1u3hhico1_r1_500.jpg

 

The Man Who Invented Bookselling As We Know It

 

On James Lackington’s Temple of the Muses, “The Cheapest Bookstore in the World”

 

By John Pipkin

 

Today, few people are likely to remember James Lackington (1746-1815) and his once-famous London bookshop, The Temple of the Muses, but if, as a customer, you’ve ever bought a remaindered book at deep discount, or wandered thoughtfully through the over-stocked shelves of a cavernous bookstore, or spent an afternoon lounging in the reading area of a bookshop (without buying anything!) then you’ve already experienced some of the ways that Lackington revolutionized bookselling in the late 18th century. And if you’re a bookseller, then the chances are that you’ve encountered marketing strategies and competitive pressures that trace their origins to Lackington’s shop. In the 21st-century marketplace, there is sometimes a longing for an earlier, simpler age, but the uneasy tension between giant and small retailers seems to have been a constant since the beginning. The Temple of the Muses, which was one of the first modern bookstores, was a mammoth enterprise, by far the largest bookstore in England, boasting an inventory of over 500,000 volumes, annual sales of 100,000 books, and yearly revenues of £5,000 (roughly $700,000 today). All of this made Lackington a very wealthy man—admired by some and despised by others—but London’s greatest bookseller began his career inauspiciously as an illiterate shoemaker.

 

One of 11 children, Lackington was apprenticed to a cobbler as a boy. He had no formal education, but at an early age he recognized the value of books, and he and his friends scoured the markets for cheap editions of poetry, plays, and classical literature in translation in order to teach themselves to read and expand their understanding of the world. Later, as a shoemaker, he moved to London with his wife, Nancy, and years later in his memoirs he describes how, upon arriving in the city, he spent their last half-crown on a book of poems, Edward Young’s Night Thoughts: “For had I bought a dinner, we should have eaten it tomorrow, and the pleasure would have been soon over, but should we live fifty years longer, we shall have the Night Thoughts to feast upon.” Shortly thereafter, in 1774, Lackington was able to rent his own shop, and he began selling both shoes and books together.

 

Late 18th-century London was a time of great social change. More people were learning to read, and the increase in leisure time among the working and middle classes meant an increased demand for books. But books were still an expensive luxury, and bookstores could be intimidating places. At the time, the typical bookstore did not encourage idle browsing or lounging. Lackington wanted to find a way to make books more affordable and accessible while still turning a profit, and with this in mind, he set about revolutionizing the book trade in at least four ways. His first innovation was to eliminate a staple of 18th-century commercial life: credit. He ran a cash-only business, which initially shocked his competitors and insulted some of his customers, but he reasoned that if he sold for cash, he could buy for cash instead of taking out costly loans; in this way he avoided interest charges as well as the losses incurred by customers unable to pay their debts. His second innovation had to do with his handling of remainder sales. The standard practice was for booksellers to buy large quantities of remaindered titles and then destroy as many as three-quarters of the books in order to drive up prices. But Lackington bought huge lots—sometimes entire libraries—and then drastically reduced the prices of all the books in order to sell them at high volume. In this way he kept books in circulation, made them affordable to a wider range of buyers, and turned a substantial profit all at the same time. Lackington’s third innovation will be familiar to anyone today who loves a bargain: he convinced his customers that they were getting a deal by refusing to haggle over prices. He posted this sign in his shop: The lowest priced is marked on every book, and no abatement made on any article.

 

By 1794, he had amassed a large enough inventory to move into a massive shop on Finsbury Square with his partner Robert Allen. He named the shop The Temple of the Muses, and above the entrance a plaque boldly announced: Cheapest Bookstore in the World. The Temple of the Muses became a tourist attraction, and this was Lackington’s fourth innovation: the sheer size of his bookstore—a spectacle that dwarfed all other bookshops of the time—made it a destination in itself. With a shop front 140 feet long, the cavernous lobby featured a circular counter with space for a mail coach and six horses to pass through. Above this counter, a staircase led up to “lounging rooms” where patrons could read beneath galleries lined with book-filled shelves, four floors in all. The higher patrons climbed, the cheaper and more tattered the books became. The poet John Keats spent many hours reading for free in the lounging rooms, and it was here that he met his first publishers, Taylor and Hessy, who worked in the shop.

 

As was common in the period, many booksellers were also publishers, and Lackington occasionally joined others in publishing ventures. Most notably, in 1818, Lackington partnered with Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones to publish a very small number (a scant 500 copies!) of an unusual novel by an unknown writer, Mary Shelley. The novel, of course, was Frankenstein. As a bookseller turned publisher, Lackington also published multiple editions of his own autobiography, in part because he was acutely aware that his reputation was at stake, since his success drew criticism from other booksellers. Some detractors argued that his catalogues exaggerated the quality of his stock, and others insisted that his wealth must have actually come from lottery winnings because it seemed impossible that he earned it from book sales alone. And still others accused Lackington of unfair competition; they argued that he controlled too great a share of the market and should “decline” his business, since he had already made his fortune. A similar argument can still be heard today; now that Amazon has begun opening brick and mortar stores (the first in Seattle in November 2015, with another to come in San Diego) some have asked if this is necessary or desirable, since the online retailer already controls as much as 60 percent of the book market.

 

And like Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Lackington himself became something of a celebrity. A flag flew above The Temple of the Muses to let customers know when he was present in the shop, and he rode through the streets of London in a carriage inscribed with his motto: “Small profits do great things.” He even minted tokens bearing his image, which could be redeemed in the shop. A catalogue of his available stock was printed on a regular basis, and orders were filled for customers as far away as America. Lackington eventually sold the shop to his third cousin in 1798 and retired to the countryside to become a part-time Methodist preacher. Sadly, The Temple of the Muses was destroyed by fire in 1841 and was never rebuilt. Although the mammoth bookshop was not part of a chain of stores—the modern chain store would not be established until a decade later when A&P Supermarket opened its doors in America—Lackington’s innovations and his controversial practice of undercutting competitors through deep-discounts and high-volume sales continue to be part of the business model for large book chains and online retailers like Barnes & Noble and Amazon to this day.

Lien vers le commentaire

TIL que les problèmes chez Airbus sur l'A400M, c'est (encore) la faute de l'état parce que pour respecter les quotas d'états membres ils ont imposé à la production de ce bijou de haute technologie d'être faite sur un site espagnol qui ne construisait que des tout petits avions de tourisme.

Lien vers le commentaire

Til que quand une valée hydrolique produit plus d'électricité que la demande, on peut utiliser cette électricité excédente pour faire tourner les turbines à l'envers et repomper de l'eau dans les réservoirs. Génial.

Lien vers le commentaire

Til que quand une valée hydrolique produit plus d'électricité que la demande, on peut utiliser cette électricité excédente pour faire tourner les turbines à l'envers et repomper de l'eau dans les réservoirs. Génial.

Ben c'est un peu le principe des barrages. Quand tu as trop d'électricité tu t'en sers pour les remplir et quand tu n'en as pas assez tu les vides.

Lien vers le commentaire

Je me rappelle d'un projet pour coupler un réacteur nucléaire à un barrage. Lorsque la demande d'électricité est basse, on utilise le réacteur pour pomper l'eau et remplir le lac de retenue.

Lien vers le commentaire

J'avais jamais pensé que ça pouvait être rempli par le bas, et je m'émerveille de peu.

 

On avait eu cette discussion il y a pas sis longtemps (moins d'un an je dirais) j'avais appris que le taux de perte lorsqu'on enchaine production d'éléctricité puis utilisation de cette électricité pour faire remonter l'eau était de l'ordre de 18%.

Un vague projet de wagons remplis de cailloux sur des rails en denivelé dans le désert américain avait été évoqué comme moyen basé sur le même principe pour stocker de l'énergie.

Lien vers le commentaire

Il existait plus grand encore, à une époque, il fallait être deux pour jouer : un sur le manche pour les notes, un sur le chevalet pour actionner les cordes.

Aucun idée du nom du truc.

Lien vers le commentaire

Ah oui l'octobasse, la plupart du temps les notes jouées ont davantage de parasites que de "vraie" notes audibles. Ce truc génère des fréquences inaudibles. Passablement aucun intérêt.

A 0:55 un crétin a oublié d'éteindre son téléphone.

Lien vers le commentaire

Il existait plus grand encore, à une époque, il fallait être deux pour jouer : un sur le manche pour les notes, un sur le chevalet pour actionner les cordes.

Aucun idée du nom du truc.

 

Sur celui là, le musicien est bien sur un chevalet mais le fabriquant a prévu des genres de "pinces" mécaniques sur le manches avec des leviers à portée pour que la même personne puisse faire vibrer les cordes et changer les notes. Au final, ce n'est pas impossible que ce soit bien l'instrument en question, juste en une version un chouillat plus moderne.

 

Le truc est délirant, accordé tellement bas que certaines notes de la gamme ne sont pas audibles et que la moitié des autres "sonnent" comme un marteau piqueur ...

Lien vers le commentaire

Créer un compte ou se connecter pour commenter

Vous devez être membre afin de pouvoir déposer un commentaire

Créer un compte

Créez un compte sur notre communauté. C’est facile !

Créer un nouveau compte

Se connecter

Vous avez déjà un compte ? Connectez-vous ici.

Connectez-vous maintenant
×
×
  • Créer...