Jump to content

Les lecteurs de science-fiction et de fantasie font de bons partenaires romantiques

Recommended Posts


Are you ready for romance, but unable to find anyone who understands how relationships actually work? Here's a suggestion: Head for a bookstore, and hang out in the science fiction/fantasy section.


New research suggests fans of those genres have more mature beliefs about romantic relationships than readers who gravitate toward suspense, romance, or even highbrow literature.


"Individuals who scored higher for exposure to science fiction/fantasy were less likely to endorse four unrealistic relationship beliefs," writes a research team led by psychologist Stephanie C. Stern of the University of Oklahoma. "Romance is not the only written fiction genre to be associated with real-world beliefs about romantic relationships."

The study, in the journal Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, featured 404 adults (a bit more than half of them female) who were recruited online. Their exposure to seven literary genres—classics, contemporary literary fiction, romance, fantasy, science fiction, suspense/thriller, and horror—was measured in a test in which they were asked to identify the names of authors who specialized in each.


They then filled out a survey in which they responded to a series of unrealistic, unhelpful beliefs about relationships: "Disagreement is destructive; mindreading is expected; romantic partners cannot change; the sexes are different; and the expectation of sexual perfection."


Specifically, they indicated on a six-point scale the degree to which they agreed with statements such as "People who have a close relationship can sense each other's needs as if they could read each other's minds," and "When couples disagree, it seems like the relationship is falling apart."


Crunching the numbers produced several surprising results.


First, people familiar with romance fiction were more likely on average to believe in only one of the aforementioned myths: that of the sexes being fundamentally different in their wants and needs. All that prose about ripping bodices apparently did not instill too many wrongheaded ideas.


The classics had similarly limited impact: Those familiar with their authors were less likely to endorse only one belief—the idea that disagreement is destructive. But people who could identify the science fiction and fantasy authors were less likely, on average, to believe four of the five myths—all except the one about sexual perfectionism.


What's more, "At least two of the specific beliefs (eschewed by sci-fi fans)—the belief that disagreement is destructive, and the belief that partners cannot change—are associated with maladaptive relationship attitudes, behaviors, and/or outcomes in the real world," the researchers note.


Specifically, previous research has linked "the belief that disagreement is destructive" with "more permissible attitudes toward intimate partner violence, control, and abuse."

Stern and her colleagues concede that these results don't prove that reading Harry Potter makes one more realistic about relationships. It's conceivable that people with more grounded views of romance are also drawn to the science-fiction/fantasy genre.


But there is evidence suggesting we pick up life lessons from works of fiction. A 2017 study found sci-fi fans hold less-rigid views about morality, an open-minded stance that may stem from the stories they enjoy.


"In fantasy, mind-reading sometimes is possible," the researchers point out. Could that impart an "understanding that in the real world, it is not?"

They also note that the hero's journey, first identified by Joseph Campbell and embodied by characters from Odysseus to Harry Potter, centers on a character who comes into his or her own power over the course of a quest. By seeing the world through their eyes, fans may come to understand "the human capacity for change"—and perhaps even apply it to their romantic partners.


In any event, the cliché of fans of these genres being lonely geeks is clearly mistaken. No doubt they have difficulties with relationships like everyone else. But it apparently helps to have J.R.R. Tolkien or George R.R. Martin as your unofficial couples counselor.


Ou du moins ils sont matures selon l'article ...


Le nom du journal par contre Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts Thinking_Face_Emoji.png?9898922749706957




Link to post
Share on other sites
Il y a 5 heures, Lancelot a dit :

Malheureusement c'est typiquement de la recherche-bullshit à base de questionnaires et d'abus de corrélations :jesaispo:

Entièrement d'accord avec cet adjectif adverbe .:lol:et merci au bescherelle nazi de passage

  • Yea 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
il y a une heure, Mégille a dit :

Comment ça, "the sexes are different" est un mythe ? Sans doute ne suis pas assez "mature"...

Je vois que je ne suis pas le seul à avoir tiqué...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Le 03/08/2018 à 20:20, Rincevent a dit :

Je vois que je ne suis pas le seul à avoir tiqué...



Sexes are different c'est pas un mythe, c'est le consensus scientifique.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Rincevent
      Ça se passe dans l'autre sens. Obliger les participants à réagir en 140 ou même 280 caractères, c'est un puissant facteur de neuneuisation. Alors que si on avait eu des voitures volantes...
    • By Sekonda
      Un économiste du GMU, physicien de formation. Bryan Caplan en dit "Quand un économiste typique me parle de ses dernières recherches, ma réaction usuelle est « Ok, peut-être », puis je l'oublie. Quand Robin Hanson me parle de ses dernières recherches, ma réaction usuelle est « C'est impossible ! », puis j'y pense pendant des années"
      Il est en autre connu pour son travail sur les marchés de prédictions et le concept futarchie qui en découle.
      Son blog :  Overcoming Bias
      The Age of Em: Work, Love and Life when Robots Rule the Earth (2016)
      The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life (avec Kevin Simler) http://elephantinthebrain.com/
  • Create New...