Jump to content

Ahmaud Arbery


Recommended Posts

Il y a 2 heures, Johnnieboy a dit :

 

Il fallait bien remettre l'église au centre du village

C'est peut-être vrai dans beaucoup d'endroits mais à Saint-Étienne au Moyen-Age, l'église était en bordure des fortifications. Un érudit local réalisant une maquette au XIXe s. l'avait donc remis au centre car cette localisation choquait son sens de la logique.

Mais c'était quand même le pur fruit de son imagination.

Comme quoi…

Je sais, cela n'a aucun rapport avec le sujet, quoique…

Link to comment

edit: je pense que ca vient de cet article, 

le mugshot n'est plus disponible a la police

 

https://www.news4jax.com/news/2013/12/09/police-man-brought-gun-to-high-school-basketball-game/

 

 

 

GEORGIA INMATE REPORT
INMATE ID: 443462641055846-ARBERY-A-GA
 
Quote

"The man ran through the parking lot. I tried to get him to stop as well. He would not stop for us," said Glynn County Schools Chief of Police, Rod Ellis. "We ended up chasing him to the back of the school were other officers helped us apprehend him."

 

definitivement un amateur de jogging :D

 
Link to comment

https://leakreality.com/video/2221/ahmaud-arbery-jogger-arrest-for-stealing-65-inch-tv-from-walmart

 

Quote

Ahmaud Arbery arrest for stealing 65 inch TV from Walmart.

On December 1, 2017 Ahmaud Arbery and three associates were by store personnel as they attempted to push a 65” Vizio television out of a Walmart. They were unable to produce a receipt and the store employees would not let them take the TV out of the store.

Police were called and stopped the four persons of interest in the parking lot on suspicion of theft.

Bodycam video of the incident shows that Arbery, then aged 23, told the police officers he was twenty years old. When an officer asked Arbery about the 65” TV he tried to push out of the store, Arbery replied “I don’t know nothin’ abut no TV brother“ Shortly after that, Arbery claimed “I had a receipt bro.”

Arbery was arrested. The Daily Beast, which reviewed the court files, has confirmed that Arbery was convicted of this "theft by shoplifting" charge:

This arrest violated Arbery's probation on this earlier gun possession conviction:

 

  • Yea 1
Link to comment
  • 1 year later...

Bon le procès a lieu, juste après Kenosha, ce sera intéressant de voir le verdict.

 

https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/3179379-20211123-proces-meurtre-ahmaud-arbery-mere-joggeur-quitte-audience-apres-tirade-ecurante-avocate-defense

 

 

Bon, par contre j'apprends qu'il vaut mieux être allemand aux USA.

 

 

" un « bel adolescent » qui a « mal tourné » et n’était pas, selon elle, dans ce quartier résidentiel pour faire un jogging. Sinon, « pourquoi ne portait-il pas de chaussettes pour cacher les ongles longs et sales de ses orteils ? »"

 

 

Pétition · Stop au port des chaussettes avec des sandales · Change.org

Link to comment

Coupable:

 

https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news/ahmaud-arbery-killing-trial-verdict-watch-11-24-21/index.html

 

Jurors found Travis McMichael guilty of murder Wednesday for chasing and fatally shooting Ahmaud, a 25-year-old Black man, as he jogged last year through a neighborhood in Glynn County, Georgia.

McMichael now faces a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. 

Jurors convicted him of one count of malice murder and four counts of felony murder

He has also been indicted on three separate federal hate crime charges, which include interference with rights, attempted kidnapping and using, carrying, brandishing, and discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. McMichael pleaded not guilty to the federal charges. 

The federal trial is set to take place in February. Since he was being held on the state charges, there has been no federal bond hearing yet. If convicted on the federal charges, he could face an additional penalty of up to life in prison. 

  • Yea 3
Link to comment
7 hours ago, Johnnieboy said:


C'est vrai que ce principe juridique est très difficile à comprendre "You can't claim self-defense if you are the unjustified, initial aggressor,"

Qu'est-ce qui te fait penser que le jury a du mal à comprendre ce principe?

 

Il y a 3 accusés, et il faut décider de quel chef d'inculpation chacun est coupable. Ça n'est pas une question oui/non, c'est normal que ça prenne du temps.

 

edit après avoir vu l'update de Marlenus:

La justice américaine semble marcher bizarrement bien ces derniers temps. Tant mieux.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...