Etienne Posté 21 décembre 2005 Signaler Posté 21 décembre 2005 If you are an economist…If you are an economist and would like to sign on to the open letter below, please e-mail your contact details and academic affiliation to us at prohibitioncosts@mpp.org. You will receive a confirmation e-mail within 48 hours that your name has been added. Please also indicate whether you would like to be a media spokesperson in your state for this study. An Open Letter to the President, Congress, Governors, and State Legislatures We, the undersigned, call your attention to the attached report by Professor Jeffrey A. Miron, The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition. The report shows that marijuana legalization -- replacing prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation -- would save $7.7 billion per year in state and federal expenditures on prohibition enforcement and produce tax revenues of at least $2.4 billion annually if marijuana were taxed like most consumer goods. If, however, marijuana were taxed similarly to alcohol or tobacco, it might generate as much as $6.2 billion annually. The fact that marijuana prohibition has these budgetary impacts does not by itself mean prohibition is bad policy. Existing evidence, however, suggests prohibition has minimal benefits and may itself cause substantial harm. We therefore urge the country to commence an open and honest debate about marijuana prohibition. We believe such a debate will favor a regime in which marijuana is legal but taxed and regulated like other goods. At a minimum, this debate will force advocates of current policy to show that prohibition has benefits sufficient to justify the cost to taxpayers, foregone tax revenues, and numerous ancillary consequences that result from marijuana prohibition. Endorsing Economists: Milton Friedman George A. Akerlof Vernon L. Smith … http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/endorsers.html
John Loque Posté 21 décembre 2005 Signaler Posté 21 décembre 2005 Je ne connaissais pas, merci Eti-N. Je crois beaucoup en ce genre de rassemblement au-delà des clivages sur un projet bien précis. On devrait lancer la même chose chez nous sur le cannabis. Il y a comme ça toute une série de questions sur lesquelles la grande majorité des économistes a une opinion opposée à celle de la majorité de la population. Cet extrêmement important pour nous de mettre ça en évidence. Exemples : - Le libre-échange, - Le contrôle des loyers, - Le salaire minimum.
Messages recommandés
Archivé
Ce sujet est désormais archivé et ne peut plus recevoir de nouvelles réponses.