José Posted July 10, 2007 Report Posted July 10, 2007 Dirty money makes the world go 'roundIt's no surprise: the West is rich, the rest is poor. Seventy to ninety percent of global income flows to the top twenty percent of the world's population. But here's what you didn't know: A lot of that money is illicit. According to conservative estimates, under-the-table financial outflows from poor countries to rich countries amounted to $500-800 billion in the 1990s and 2000s. That's ten times more than the foreign aid that made its way from rich countries to poor countries during that same time period: a mere $50-80 billion. Raymond Baker, director of Global Financial Integrity, shared these numbers at a presentation he gave yesterday. He says that the trend of hiding cash in wealthy nations' bank accounts started in the 1960s when elites in the newly-independent developing world realized that they didn't need to tuck stacks of rolled-up currency under the mattresses. Sending it to safe havens in places like Zurich, London and Manhattan was far easier. The ease with which dirty money travels around it the world is the biggest legal loophole of capitalism. It's made those sitting in the top twenty percent of the income tower a lot richer. But shouldn't it make them a little uncomfortable too? http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/5324 Les chiffres dont on parle ici font référence aux transferts d'argent "sale", dissimulé au fisc ou généré par des activités "illégales". Les données proviennent du livre Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers, and Copycats are Hijacking the Global Economy, dont le premier chapitre est disponible sur Internet. Entre autres choses, on y apprend que les entrepreneurs "illicites" ont fait la même chose que les groupes terroristes à partir des années '90 : passer de structures très hiérarchisées aux réseaux. Since the early 1990s, global illicit trade has embarked on a great mutation. It is the same mutation as that of international terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda or Islamic Jihad -- or for that matter, of activists for the global good like the environmental movement or the World Social Forum. All have moved away from fixed hierarchies and toward decentralized networks; away from controlling leaders and toward multiple, loosely linked, dispersed agents and cells; away from rigid lines of control and exchange and toward constantly shifting transactions as opportunities dictate. It is a mutation that governments in the 1990s barely recognized and could not, in any case, hope to emulate.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.