Evo a sa constitution

[Taranne]

A landmark for Bolivia

It may not help a fraught relationship with Washington, but Bolivia's new constitution is a victory to savour

Comments (…)

* Richard Gott

Sunday's referendum vote on a new constitution for Bolivia, which has led to a predicted victory for president Evo Morales and his Movement for Socialism party, will be welcomed by all those anxious for the country's future, but it will not in itself lead to a healing of the country's deep political and ethnic divisions. Yet it will certainly provide Morales with some breathing space as he contemplates the next steps to be taken towards a fairer society, to give the indigenous majority of the population the possibility of participating more comprehensively in Bolivian politics.

During the course of last year, the country was close to an undeclared civil war, with violence erupting in several cities, and rising to a violent crescendo in September. An opposition-inspired massacre of 18 people, mostly indigenous farmers, in the northern town of Pando led to political intervention by the newly-created Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). The subsequent establishment of formal negotiations in October between government and opposition allowed the referendum to take place in relatively peaceful conditions.

Some have compared Morales' strategy with that of Hugo Chávez, who organised the re-writing of the Venezuelan constitution shortly after his election in 1998, and used it as a springboard for reformist measures in many areas of national life. The reforms proposed by Morales are comparably radical, yet many people would argue that they are long overdue. Unlike Chávez, who seeks a constitutional reform in February that would permit a president to enjoy permanent re-election (if actually re-elected), Morales agreed during October's negotiations with the opposition that the constitution would require presidents to stand down after two terms. He will put his name forward again for re-election next year, and since he is an indigenous candidate representing the majority population, he will almost certainly win.

The problems in Bolivia are caused largely by the ethnic minority, mostly the descendants of white settlers, who live in the eastern provinces of the country that contain the chief engines of the economy – oil and gas. Many of these people have a racist and fascist mentality and, after centuries in control, dislike the prospect of their future being dominated by the formerly-suppressed indigenous majority.

Like so much else in the world, much will depend on the decisions taken by Obama's team. The outgoing administration had long been opposed to Morales, even before he was first elected, regarding the former leader of the coca-growers' union as a political firebrand and not much better than a drug baron. The Americans worked so openly with the opposition behind the scenes that Morales was obliged last year to expel the US ambassador, a gesture that was immediately imitated by Chávez. (Morales repaid the compliment this month by expelling the Israeli ambassador from La Paz, during the Israeli assault on Gaza, in the wake of the Venezuelan decision to do the same.)

Obama will certainly wish to distance himself from the legacy of George Bush, and the relative quiescence of the Bolivian opposition since the Pando massacre suggests that they are unsure what future assistance they will get from Washington. The traditional allies of Bolivia's white minority have been their close Latin American neighbours, Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay, but these – on a leftist path – have all expressed their support and solidarity for Morales.

Whatever the eventual outcome of Morales' reforms, the new approved constitution is a major landmark in Bolivian history, providing for the long-needed re-shaping of the judiciary (including the establishment of "community courts"), a revival of the land reform legislation of the 1950s (including a cap on the size of landholdings by an individual owner), and the safe-guarding of the oil and gas reserves for the benefit of the people. Yet more important – and at the heart of the new constitutional charter – are the clauses that strengthen the rights of the country's indigenous peoples. Sunday's victory is one to savour and ponder, and will create frissons of excitement throughout Latin America.

[Brock]

safe-guarding of the oil and gas reserves for the benefit of the people

of course

[José]

…Richard Gott du Guardian ne se tient plus de joie…

Ce qui prouve sa connerie à suffisance : ce référendum ne règle absolument rien, il a été rejeté majoritairement par toutes les provinces orientales (5 sur 9). Bref, le pays reste aussi divisé et la partition menace toujours.

[Nick de Cusa]

Il a eu une chance d'être le Mandela de la Bolivie, mais au lieu de cela il a choisi d'en être le Mugabe.

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904/bolivia

[h16]

http://www.liberation.fr/monde/0101561194-…reve-de-la-faim

Le président proteste contre l'opposition de droite qui bloque l'approbation de la nouvelle loi électorale censée convoquer des élections générales en décembre. Un scrutin dont Morales serait le grand favori…

C’était peu après l’heure du petit-déjeuner ce jeudi : «Face à la négligence d’un groupe de parlementaires néolibéraux, nous nous sommes sentis obligés de prendre cette mesure pour défendre le vote du peuple.» C’est ainsi qu’Evo Morales, président de la Bolivie, a lancé depuis une salle de son palais présidentiel sa grève de la faim. Avec un objectif: mettre la pression sur le Congrès où la loi électorale est en discussion.

Si le parti de Morales, le MAS (Mouvement vers le socialisme), est majoritaire au Parlement, l’opposition de droite contrôle en effet le Sénat et peut laisser le Congrès sans le quorum nécessaire à l’approbation de la loi. Or, le texte censé convoquer des élections générales pour le mois de décembre, la droite libérale et régionaliste ne le digère pas.

Les dirigeants de l’opposition contestent en vrac l’actuel fichier électoral qu’ils jugent obsolète, la validation annoncée par les autorités du vote des Boliviens vivant à l’étranger, et cherchent à réduire le nombre de sièges de députés destinés aux peuples indigènes.

Ce serait bien qu'il clabote, mais le risque de martyromanie est grand.

[ibinico]

Avec les récentes décisions de Hugo Chavèz, la démocratie vénézuélienne est en train de chanceller selon The Economist.

Quelques extraits :

AFTER winning a referendum to abolish presidential term limits on February 15th, Venezuela’s president, Hugo Chávez, said he was embarking on the “third phase” of his “Bolivarian revolution”. On the evidence so far, one of its main traits will be the repression of dissent and the concentration of even more power in Mr Chávez’s own hands. As a result, Venezuela’s democracy is in “serious danger of collapse”, the country’s Catholic bishops said in an Easter message.

[…]

He has been even less subtle with Antonio Ledezma, an opponent who was elected mayor of Caracas last year. His offices have been taken over by chavista mobs. A law is being rushed through parliament to render his post largely symbolic, by creating a powerful, appointed vice-president for Caracas. According to Mr Ledezma, the government “is acting outside the constitution,” while the courts are more like “firing-squads”.

[…]

The government also has plans to tighten legal controls on the media. New government-controlled workers’ councils will undermine the trade unions. A planned “international co-operation law” would make it hard for human-rights groups to obtain foreign funding.

Et oui, même les syndicats de travailleurs sont réprimés. Amusant dans un pays qui se veut à la pointe du social.

[José]

Et oui, même les syndicats de travailleurs sont réprimés.

C'est le grand classique des pays socialistes.