Roniberal Posté 18 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Ben oui, il n'y a pas que Ron Paul quand même… http://www.kentforliberty.com/
Rincevent Posté 18 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Ben oui, il n'y a pas que Ron Paul quand même…http://www.kentforliberty.com/ Oh, la vache… Maintenant, je comprend mieux ce que voulait dire ce bloggueur.
Roniberal Posté 18 mai 2007 Auteur Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Maintenant, je comprend mieux ce que voulait dire ce bloggueur. And so what? Tu trouves qu'il y a des arguments dans ces deux articles de blog? Moi non.
A.B. Posté 18 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Il est génial Kent http://www.kentforliberty.com/platform.html Si Ron Paul était 1% aussi libéral ce serait un immense progrès pour lui… http://www.selectsmart.com/president/2008.html Je tombe sur Kent, suivit de Ron You have found the website of Kent McManigal; MountainMan, primitive survivalist, "Hooligan libertarian", anarchist, former presidential candidate, opinionated writer of blogs and letters-to-editors, gun lover, UFO loving skeptic, animal lover, karaoke singer, and all-around character. Welcome! Je veux le rencontrer ce gar !
Roniberal Posté 18 mai 2007 Auteur Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Si Ron Paul était 1% aussi libéral ce serait un immense progrès pour lui… N'exagérons rien non plus. Ceci dit, je viens de me rendre compte qu'il vient d'abandonner sa campagne.
Sous-Commandant Marco Posté 18 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Ben oui, il n'y a pas que Ron Paul quand même…http://www.kentforliberty.com/ Un peu trop chevelu pour être honnête.
A.B. Posté 18 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 18 mai 2007 Un peu trop chevelu pour être honnête. Tu m'aurais vu il y a un an… Kent McManigal, should you google your own name and see this thread, I want you to know that I think you rule. I can't understand why libertarians get exited at a statist like Ron Paul running. I also loved your "time's up" flag. Good luck.
Rincevent Posté 19 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 19 mai 2007 As a libertarian I was always aware that it was appropriate to be tolerant of alternative lifestyles. But until I walked into that room, I had no idea just how many alternatives there were.
Ronnie Hayek Posté 20 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Si Ron Paul était 1% aussi libéral ce serait un immense progrès pour lui… Libéral n'est pas synonyme de fumeur de joints décérébré - juste à titre de piqûre de rappel, hein.
WALDGANGER Posté 20 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Un peu trop chevelu pour être honnête. Ils ont la classe les libertariens aux Etats-Unis
A.B. Posté 20 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Libéral n'est pas synonyme de fumeur de joints décérébré - juste à titre de piqûre de rappel, hein. Certes, mais le programme du docteur est plutot de droite conservatrice que libertarien tandis que celui de MacManigal est pratiquement irréprochable.
Sous-Commandant Marco Posté 20 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Certes, mais le programme du docteur est plutot de droite conservatrice que libertarien tandis que celui de MacManigal est pratiquement irréprochable. Il a l'air sympa effectivement mais sois honnête: quelles sont ses chances de pouvoir appliquer ses idées un jour?
Roniberal Posté 20 mai 2007 Auteur Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Certes, mais le programme du docteur est plutot de droite conservatrice que libertarien tandis que celui de MacManigal est pratiquement irréprochable. Le programme du "docteur" est un authentique programme libéral avec ses défauts (drogues, immigration…). Au sujet des drogues, j'ai lu ça récemment: http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/16/ron…on-health-care/ "Ironically, on health care issues about which they disagree, Bush is closer than Dr. Paul to the Libertarian position. The most obvious example involves their positions on government arm-twisting of the pharmaceutical industry: Ron Paul: Today, the U.S. House of Representatives voted today to allow the government to “negotiate” the price of prescription drugs bought for Medicare Part D. Ron Paul voted for it. George W. Bush: President Bush promised on Thursday to veto Democratic-drafted legislation requiring the government to negotiate with drug companies … In other words, Paul (the professed Libertarian) is for government interference in the free market while Bush (the big-government conservative) is against it. An odd reversal of roles to say the least. Nonetheless, considering the animosity that most Ron Paul partisans feel toward President Bush, it is indeed ironic that there isn’t really much daylight between the two men on health care policy. " Pour l'immigration, je reposte ce lien à nouveau: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul269.html Ceci dit, l'ami McManigal a également ses faiblesses sur la recherche sur les cellules souches et l'avortement http://selectsmart.com/president/2008/McManigal.html En dehors de ces deux points cruciaux, je trouve aussi que McManigal est le candidat parfait. Je suis en train de correspondre avec lui par mail et… comme par hasard, j'ai attiré son attention sur l'avortement et la recherche sur les cellules souches! J'attends sa réponse maintenant! Il a l'air sympa effectivement mais sois honnête: quelles sont ses chances de pouvoir appliquer ses idées un jour? Il vient de se retirer de la course à la présidentielle. Franchement, je pense que j'aurais voté pour lui si j'étais étatsunien et si il se présentait. Bon, certes, il a un physique un peu… mais bon, ce n'est pas l'essentiel, j'aime son intransigeance, je comprends mieux maintenant pourquoi l'ami Fillias ne se reconnaît pas dans le LP!
Roniberal Posté 20 mai 2007 Auteur Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Je veux le rencontrer ce gar ! Ce gars. Sinon, j'ai l'impression que c'est surtout son style un peu "baba-cool" (mais authentiquement libertarien, je ne dis pas le contraire) qui t'attire…
A.B. Posté 20 mai 2007 Signaler Posté 20 mai 2007 Le programme du "docteur" est un authentique programme libéral avec ses défauts (drogues, immigration…). Avortement, suicide assisté aussi. Mais je vais pas te convaincre en dix lignes.
Roniberal Posté 21 mai 2007 Auteur Signaler Posté 21 mai 2007 Avortement, suicide assisté aussi. Mais je vais pas te convaincre en dix lignes. Bref, le parfait candidat libéral!
Kent McManigal Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 Hello. I am Kent McManigal. I don't speak or read French, but will do my best to answer any questions you may have for me. I can translate using BabelFish if I need to, although sometimes the translated text is a bit strange. I am no longer campaigning for US President, but only offer myself as a "write-in" candidate for those who can not, with a clear conscience, vote for any of the people who will appear on the ballot.
h16 Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 On our side, we shall do our best to speak directly in English. Welcome. By the way, how would you define Ron Paul as presidential candidates go ? (there are some threads about him in this subforum, noticeably here)
Invité Arn0 Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 C'est la gloire : on attire même les (presque) candidats aux élections présidentielles US ! Welcome !
A.B. Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 Kent McManigal, should you google your own name and see this thread, I want you to know that I think you rule. I can't understand why libertarians get exited at a statist like Ron Paul running. I also loved your "time's up" flag. Good luck. Hello. I am Kent McManigal. I don't speak or read French, but will do my best to answer any questions you may have for me. I can translate using BabelFish if I need to, although sometimes the translated text is a bit strange. I am no longer campaigning for US President, but only offer myself as a "write-in" candidate for those who can not, with a clear conscience, vote for any of the people who will appear on the ballot. It worked ! Hi Kent, this is a francophone (mostly French and Belgian) libertarian and classic liberal forum, some anarcho-capitalists, some minarchists and occasionally some trolling socialist scum . I for myself am a French "political refugee" living in the US since 2005. I appreciate your radicalism which is too rare, and that I haven't quite found at my local LP (it's nyc, what do you want…)
Ash Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 Hello. I am Kent McManigal. I don't speak or read French, but will do my best to answer any questions you may have for me. I can translate using BabelFish if I need to, although sometimes the translated text is a bit strange. I am no longer campaigning for US President, but only offer myself as a "write-in" candidate for those who can not, with a clear conscience, vote for any of the people who will appear on the ballot. In the first place : what did you think about explosive couch ? It's a big discussion here. (private joke inside)
A.B. Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 In the first place : what did you think about explosive couch ? It's a big discussion here. (private joke inside) Ash is referring to a thought experiment we had regarding suicide, contracts, the inalienability of the will, and property rights… it would be long to retrace the whole story but it boils down to someone inviting you over, and failing to mention that his couch is loaded with explosive that detonate when you sit on it. It's mostly used as a joke here, along with the "shredding door", a similar device
Kent McManigal Posté 15 juin 2007 Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 how would you define Ron Paul as presidential candidates go ? Ron Paul is the best Republican/Democrat candidate running. There are some issues I disagree with him on, such as immigration. He would still be a better President than any other Republican or Democrat who is running. A Libertarian President would be much better. No President or government at all would be the best scenario, in my opinion. If you would like, you can read an interview of me on another French forum here: Forum 21 There is a thread just about me and then some threads about different issues that I debate with some other people. Exploding couch! Perhaps I should begin wearing Kevlar pants.
Roniberal Posté 15 juin 2007 Auteur Signaler Posté 15 juin 2007 Hello. I am Kent McManigal. I don't speak or read French, but will do my best to answer any questions you may have for me. I can translate using BabelFish if I need to, although sometimes the translated text is a bit strange. I am no longer campaigning for US President, but only offer myself as a "write-in" candidate for those who can not, with a clear conscience, vote for any of the people who will appear on the ballot. Hi Kent! Welcome here. I am happy that, finally, you decided to rejoin us. On our side, we shall do our best to speak directly in English. Yes, it is better. By the way, how would you define Ron Paul as presidential candidates go ? (there are some threads about him in this subforum, noticeably here) There are also these ones: http://www.liberaux.org/index.php?showtopi…mp;#entry268593 http://www.liberaux.org/index.php?showtopic=31319 (for your information, "Segolaide" is Ségolène Royal, the French Socialist candidate (who, luckily lost against Nicolas Sarkozy). We hate her here and it is the reason why our "walking encyclopedia", Ronnie Hayek, has likened Giuliani to her).
Messages recommandés
Archivé
Ce sujet est désormais archivé et ne peut plus recevoir de nouvelles réponses.