Nobel Littérature

[Chitah]

PS : Je vais me décider à commander Un nouveau modèle économique : Développement, justice, liberté, à moins que tu ne veuilles me le préter.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Je l'ai prété à un pote, pour qu'il blinde un peu son argumentation (pour simplifier). Son analyse en termes de capacité, qui justifie sur certains domaines restreints, l'intervention de l'Etat, est plus intéressante que l'analyse en termes de lutte des classes élargie (marxisme), ou de risques (issue de la réflexion d'un allemand qui a écrit un livre s'appelant la société du risque).

[José]

Le vainqueur est le dramaturge britannique Harold Pinter.

L'année prochaine : Chomsky.

[Taranne]

Ou Gore Vidal?

Bon, Harry est très content de son Prix et si on espérait que la joie lui clouerait momentanément le bec, eh ben c'est raté.

Pinter: Torture and misery in name of freedom

By Harold Pinter who yesterday won the Nobel Prize for Literature

Published: 14 October 2005

The great poet Wilfred Owen articulated the tragedy, the horror - and indeed the pity - of war in a way no other poet has. Yet we have learnt nothing. Nearly 100 years after his death the world has become more savage, more brutal, more pitiless.

But the "free world" we are told, as embodied in the United States and Great Britain, is different to the rest of the world since our actions are dictated and sanctioned by a moral authority and a moral passion condoned by someone called God. Some people may find this difficult to comprehend but Osama Bin Laden finds it easy.

What would Wilfred Owen make of the invasion of Iraq? A bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of International Law. An arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public. An act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort (all other justifications having failed to justify themselves) - as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands upon thousands of innocent people.

An independent and totally objective account of the Iraqi civilian dead in the medical magazine The Lancet estimates that the figure approaches 100,000. But neither the US or the UK bother to count the Iraqi dead. As General Tommy Franks of US Central Command memorably said: "We don't do body counts".

We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery and degradation to the Iraqi people and call it " bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East". But, as we all know, we have not been welcomed with the predicted flowers. What we have unleashed is a ferocious and unremitting resistance, mayhem and chaos.

You may say at this point: what about the Iraqi elections? Well, President Bush himself answered this question when he said: "We cannot accept that there can be free democratic elections in a country under foreign military occupation". I had to read that statement twice before I realised that he was talking about Lebanon and Syria.

What do Bush and Blair actually see when they look at themselves in the mirror?

I believe Wilfred Owen would share our contempt, our revulsion, our nausea and our shame at both the language and the actions of the American and British governments.

Adapted by Harold Pinter from a speech he delivered on winning the Wilfred Owen Award earlier this year

'A colossal figure'

"You have no idea how I happy I am that you have won the Nobel Prize for Literature. I think you absolutely deserve it."

Vaclav Havel, PLAYWRIGHT AND FORMER CZECH PRESIDENT (BY TELEGRAM TO PINTER)

"As a writer, Harold has been unswerving for 50 years. With his earliest work he stood alone in British theatre up against the bewilderment and incomprehension of critics, the audience and writers too."

Sir Tom Stoppard, PLAYWRIGHT

"It couldn't have happened to a nicer person and it's a most fitting award."

Sir Alan Ayckbourn, ACTOR, WRITER AND DIRECTOR

"He has blown fresh air into the musty attic of conventional English literature by insisting that everything he does has a public and political dimension."

David Hare, PLAYWRIGHT

"Harold Pinter has been a colossal figure in British literature for nearly 50 years … I'm delighted that he's now been further recognised with the Nobel Prize."

Tessa Jowell, CULTURE SECRETARY

The great poet Wilfred Owen articulated the tragedy, the horror - and indeed the pity - of war in a way no other poet has. Yet we have learnt nothing. Nearly 100 years after his death the world has become more savage, more brutal, more pitiless.

But the "free world" we are told, as embodied in the United States and Great Britain, is different to the rest of the world since our actions are dictated and sanctioned by a moral authority and a moral passion condoned by someone called God. Some people may find this difficult to comprehend but Osama Bin Laden finds it easy.

What would Wilfred Owen make of the invasion of Iraq? A bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of International Law. An arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public. An act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort (all other justifications having failed to justify themselves) - as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands upon thousands of innocent people.

An independent and totally objective account of the Iraqi civilian dead in the medical magazine The Lancet estimates that the figure approaches 100,000. But neither the US or the UK bother to count the Iraqi dead. As General Tommy Franks of US Central Command memorably said: "We don't do body counts".

We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery and degradation to the Iraqi people and call it " bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East". But, as we all know, we have not been welcomed with the predicted flowers. What we have unleashed is a ferocious and unremitting resistance, mayhem and chaos.

You may say at this point: what about the Iraqi elections? Well, President Bush himself answered this question when he said: "We cannot accept that there can be free democratic elections in a country under foreign military occupation". I had to read that statement twice before I realised that he was talking about Lebanon and Syria.

What do Bush and Blair actually see when they look at themselves in the mirror?

I believe Wilfred Owen would share our contempt, our revulsion, our nausea and our shame at both the language and the actions of the American and British governments.

Adapted by Harold Pinter from a speech he delivered on winning the Wilfred Owen Award earlier this year

La grande parade des lèche-cul:

'A colossal figure'

"You have no idea how I happy I am that you have won the Nobel Prize for Literature. I think you absolutely deserve it."

Vaclav Havel, PLAYWRIGHT AND FORMER CZECH PRESIDENT (BY TELEGRAM TO PINTER)

"As a writer, Harold has been unswerving for 50 years. With his earliest work he stood alone in British theatre up against the bewilderment and incomprehension of critics, the audience and writers too."

Sir Tom Stoppard, PLAYWRIGHT

"It couldn't have happened to a nicer person and it's a most fitting award."

Sir Alan Ayckbourn, ACTOR, WRITER AND DIRECTOR

"He has blown fresh air into the musty attic of conventional English literature by insisting that everything he does has a public and political dimension."

David Hare, PLAYWRIGHT

"Harold Pinter has been a colossal figure in British literature for nearly 50 years … I'm delighted that he's now been further recognised with the Nobel Prize."

Tessa Jowell, CULTURE SECRETARY

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politi…ticle319540.ece

[Etienne]

Je n'ai pas encore vu d'éléments intéressants critiquant Sen intelligemment, je parle notamment de sa classification des théories de la justice selon la base d'information.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Je crois que j'ai formulé différement le propos de Sen - enfin, je viens de m'en rendre compte - en disant que la théorie libertarienne ne capturait pas bien tout le sens de la notion de justice, qui, faisant partie du langage naturel, est remplie d'ambiguïtés sémantiques à lever. D'une certaine manière, en ne se focalisant que sur un aspect particulier, mais néanmoins important, elle élude une large part de ce que recouvre cette notion…

[Chitah]

Je crois que j'ai formulé différement le propos de Sen - enfin, je viens de m'en rendre compte - en disant que la théorie libertarienne ne capturait pas bien tout le sens de la notion de justice, qui, faisant partie du langage naturel, est remplie d'ambiguïtés sémantiques à lever. D'une certaine manière, en ne se focalisant que sur un aspect particulier, mais néanmoins important, elle élude une large part de ce que recouvre cette notion…

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

La théorie libertarienne est extrêmement intéressante, mais je crois qu'elle souffre encore d'un manque de boucle de feedback, excusez l'anglicisme. En fait, il me semble que le problème principal de cette théorie réside dans ceux qui croient la porter, et qui en font une construction de type évangélique.

N'oublions pas que toute théorie n'est scientifique que dès lors qu'elle est réfutable, si elle ne l'est pas, c'est que ce champ de connaissance appartient à un autre domaine, celui du culte. Et dans ce cas, ça ne m'intéresse pas du tout.