Aller au contenu

Commandante Donald Trump : troll, puis candidat puis président puis putschiste puis re président

Neomatix

Par Neomatix
dans Europe et international

Messages recommandés

Brock

Brock

Posté
Posté

Ils sont sympas mais ce que Trump a reussi a faire du Gop les botte manifestement en touche...

c'est quoi le positionnement politique de Slate? c'est pas clair

 

 

Marlenus

Marlenus

Posté
Posté
  Le 20/05/2020 à 22:53, Brock a dit :

Ils sont sympas mais ce que Trump a reussi a faire du Gop les botte manifestement en touche...

c'est quoi le positionnement politique de Slate? c'est pas clair

 

 

Expand  

Gauche SJW clairement.

Ils mettent en étendard l'écriture inclusive par exemple.

Ils ont quelques cocos et féministes bien gratinées (Titiou Lecoq par exemple)

 

Mais il leur arrive d'avoir des articles intéressants (enfin de mon point de vue) une fois que tu évites leurs marottes.

 

(Il est marrant d'ailleurs qu'ils ont été pris entre deux feux pendant l'affaire de la ligue du lol, vu que c'est sorti avec un de leurs auteurs récurrent et que l'un des membres actifs est leur rédac chef :D )

Vilfredo

Vilfredo

Posté
Posté
  Le 21/05/2020 à 19:03, Rincevent a dit :

J'apprends que Trump est un pervers narcissique, un prédateur sadique qui a délibérément décidé d'un démocide. Rien que ça.

 

https://www.salon.com/2020/04/25/psychologist-john-gartner-trump-is-a-sexual-sadist-who-is-actively-engaging-in-sabotage/

Expand  

Oui et son écriture nous apprend que c'est un mangeur d'enfants diabolique, en gros Mao + Staline + Hitler + le café salé + le vampire de Düsseldorf

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/trump-handwriting-liar-916797/

  Citation

Donald Trump's handwriting reveals he's a lying, lazy, arrogant person, according to an expert.

Expand  

Experts be expertizin'

Brock

Brock

Posté
Posté

:D ca m'aurait etonne qu'il trouvent que c'est un homme d'une grande bonte sur qui on peut compter ahahah

Brock

Brock

Posté
Posté

ah si SI moi je trouve que si :)

d'ailleurs si je ne m'abuse il me semble qu'il a recu differents awards dans les 80s et 90s, qui ont ete promptement oublies pour le faire passer pour un raciste...

Johnnieboy

Johnnieboy

Posté
Posté
  Le 21/05/2020 à 21:44, Brock a dit :

ah si SI moi je trouve que si :)

d'ailleurs si je ne m'abuse il me semble qu'il a recu differents awards dans les 80s et 90s, qui ont ete promptement oublies pour le faire passer pour un raciste...

Expand  

 

Arrête donc ton char de fanboy, ça devient vraiment gênant, en fait.

1181909136_Screenshot2020-05-22at8_39_05AM.thumb.png.349db1ad75176c6d2543777b92bd305b.png

  • 2 weeks later...
Freezbee

Freezbee

Posté
Posté
  Citation

James Mattis Denounces President Trump, Describes Him as a Threat to the Constitution

 

In an extraordinary condemnation, the former defense secretary backs protesters and says the president is trying to turn Americans against one another.

 

original.jpg

 

James Mattis, the esteemed Marine general who resigned as secretary of defense in December 2018 to protest Donald Trump’s Syria policy, has, ever since, kept studiously silent about Trump’s performance as president. But he has now broken his silence, writing an extraordinary broadside in which he denounces the president for dividing the nation, and accuses him of ordering the U.S. military to violate the constitutional rights of American citizens.

 
 

“I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled,” Mattis writes. “The words ‘Equal Justice Under Law’ are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation.” He goes on, “We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution.”

 

In his j’accuse, Mattis excoriates the president for setting Americans against one another.

 

“Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead, he tries to divide us,” Mattis writes. “We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.”

 

He goes on to contrast the American ethos of unity with Nazi ideology. “Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that ‘The Nazi slogan for destroying us … was “Divide and Conquer.” Our American answer is “In Union there is Strength.”’ We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics.”

 

Mattis’s dissatisfaction with Trump was no secret inside the Pentagon. But after his resignation, he argued publicly—and to great criticism—that it would be inappropriate and counterproductive for a former general, and a former Cabinet official, to criticize a sitting president. Doing so, he said, would threaten the apolitical nature of the military. When I interviewed him last year on this subject, he said, “When you leave an administration over clear policy differences, you need to give the people who are still there as much opportunity as possible to defend the country. They still have the responsibility of protecting this great big experiment of ours.” He did add, however: “There is a period in which I owe my silence. It’s not eternal. It’s not going to be forever.”

 

That period is now definitively over. Mattis reached the conclusion this past weekend that the American experiment is directly threatened by the actions of the president he once served. In his statement, Mattis makes it clear that the president’s response to the police killing of George Floyd, and the ensuing protests, triggered this public condemnation.

 

“When I joined the military, some 50 years ago,” he writes, “I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.”

 

He goes on to implicitly criticize the current secretary of defense, Mark Esper, and other senior officials as well. “We must reject any thinking of our cities as a ‘battlespace’ that our uniformed military is called upon to ‘dominate.’ At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.

 

Here is the text of the complete statement.

 

  Citation

In Union There Is Strength

I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words “Equal Justice Under Law” are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation.

 

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.

 

We must reject any thinking of our cities as a “battlespace” that our uniformed military is called upon to “dominate.” At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.

 

James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that “America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat.” We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law.

 

Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength.’” We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics.

 

Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.

 

We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another. The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community. Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country. We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Square. We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution. At the same time, we must remember Lincoln’s “better angels,” and listen to them, as we work to unite.

 

Only by adopting a new path—which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals—will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad.

Expand  

 

Expand  

 

  • Yea 1
Frenhofer

Frenhofer

Posté
Posté
  Le 10/06/2020 à 06:01, cedric.org a dit :

https://www.sudouest.fr/2020/06/08/video-covid-19-trump-visite-sans-masque-une-usine-de-tests-la-production-est-detruite-7547137-11064.php

 

4d chess, man

 

(j'avoue avoir un doute sur la véracité tellement c'est gros)

Expand  

J'avais vu passer l'information. Apparemment, l'usine était prévue d'être fermé pour la visite prez, et ils ont fait tourné 2 3 trucs pour la visite. Pareil pour Macron ou un autre. Il n'y a rien de spécial à dire mais les journaux twistent en sous-entendant que le lourdaud orange a fait des conneries.

Orange man bad again.

jjf

jjf

Posté
Posté

https://www.nouvelobs.com/monde/20200606.OBS29782/trump-la-mafia-et-la-maison-blanche.html

 

  Quote

  

Jamais, dans l’histoire des États-Unis, un chef de l’Etat n’a été aussi véreux. Compromis avec l’extrême-droite, mouillé avec les Russes, en affaire avec les Saoudiens, Donald Trump brise toutes les conventions, les garde-fous et les habitudes de la fonction : de plus, comme le révèle le journaliste d’investigation Fabrizio Calvi dans son livre passionnant, « Un parrain à la Maison Blanche » (Albin Michel), Trump a toujours traité avec le crime organisé. Constructions édifiées avec l’aide de la mafia italienne, prêts consentis par des banques louches ou carrément dévoyés, flux d’argent en provenance de la délinquance moscovite… Au fil des pages, on découvre un aigrefin toujours prêt à vendre ses proches et à optimiser ses avantages financiers. Fabrizio Calvi, au cours d’une enquête formidable, a rassemblé témoignages et dossiers. Il brosse le portrait d’un homme sans scrupule qui a réussi à échapper à la justice depuis cinquante ans. Parvenu au sommet du pouvoir, peut-il rester impuni ? S’il est élu en novembre 2020, il sera hors d’atteinte. Perdant, il risque de finir sa vie en prison. L’enjeu ? L’Amérique.

Les relations de Donald Trump avec la mafia sont anciennes, semble-t-il.

Oui. Ce sont des relations familiales. Le grand-père de Donald Trump, Frederick Trump, travaillait avec la criminalité

... 

Expand  

 

Rincevent

Rincevent

Posté
Posté

Jamais de mémoire de journaliste, donc dans les deux dernières années.

 

Une bonne nouvelle, toutefois ;  maintenant que Trump fait comme ses prédécesseurs depuis Roosevelt, on ose taper sur les Saoudiens. :mrgreen:

jjf

jjf

Posté
Posté
  Le 16/06/2020 à 17:36, PABerryer a dit :

Plus que Kennedy ?

Expand  

 

En faite je n'en ai pas la moindre idée, mais je me doute bien que ce sont tous des crapules rendu à ce poste.

As-tu des lectures à recommander pour savoir dans quoi trempait Kennedy ?

Frenhofer

Frenhofer

Posté
Posté
  Le 17/06/2020 à 08:30, Moustachu a dit :

 

Franchement après avoir lu ce genre de bouse, je n'ai qu'une envie, que Trump écrase Biden en Novembre.

Expand  

Moi je ne lis même plus toutes les 'analyses' des USA par les journalistes français, autant aller directement lire les américains parlant d'eux-mêmes.

L'avis de journalistes français sur les USA, ça ne vaut pas plus que l'avis de Steevy sur la chromodynamique quantique.

  • Yea 4
  • Haha 1
Rübezahl

Rübezahl

Posté
Posté

Biden va gagner. Biden va gagner. Biden va gagner. Biden va gagner.

Voilà la nalyse que les MSMs fr vont nous servir jusqu'à l'élection.

Et puis, à l'énoncé des résultats, forte probabilité de trépignations pendant plusieurs jours.

  • Yea 1
Lameador

Lameador

Posté
Posté
  Le 17/06/2020 à 10:35, Frenhofer a dit :

Moi je ne lis même plus toutes les 'analyses' des USA par les journalistes français, autant aller directement lire les américains parlant d'eux-mêmes.

L'avis de journalistes français sur les USA, ça ne vaut pas plus que l'avis de Steevy sur la chromodynamique quantique.

Expand  

 

Steevy n'est pas idiot, et a peut-être un regard profane pertinent ou amusant sur la chromodynamique quantique. Les journalistes FR, eux, sont plutôt des propagandistes. La valeur de leurs analyses n'est pas nulle, elle est négative.

  • Yea 1
Mégille

Mégille

Posté
Posté

Si Steevy est une personne sensée, il a sans doute le même avis que moi sur la chromodynamique quantique : pourquoi 8 et pas 9 putain de gluons ?! Ca n'a aucun sens.

  • Yea 1
  • Love 1

Créer un compte ou se connecter pour commenter

Vous devez être membre afin de pouvoir déposer un commentaire

Créer un compte

Créez un compte sur notre communauté. C’est facile !

Créer un nouveau compte

Se connecter

Vous avez déjà un compte ? Connectez-vous ici.

Connectez-vous maintenant
Aller sur la liste des sujets
×
×
  • Créer...