Adrian Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 China is officially the biggest air polluter in the world and the sole ruler of our list of 8 countries that produce the most acid rain in the world. Thanks to the rapid industrialization, China is also the biggest iron and steel producer in the world and the number one country when it comes to coal consumption. According to the reports dating from 2011, 258 of China’s towns are affected by acid rains. The government is showing a lack of care and is still to take effective measures in reducing this huge problem. China doesn’t just produce acid rains on its own territory, but all across Asia; its reckless air pollution could not just have terrible consequences on the water and vegetation there, but also in the neighboring countries and further. http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/8-countries-that-produce-the-most-acid-rain-in-the-world-471096/ Link to comment
FabriceM Posted November 9, 2016 Report Share Posted November 9, 2016 Les chinois semblent prendre vraiment mal l'élection de Trump China Is Suddenly Dumping Treasuries Link to comment
Tramp Posted November 9, 2016 Report Share Posted November 9, 2016 Ils ont dû avoir des pressions sur le RMB si les marchés craignent des sanctions commerciales. Le pésos a morflé, ils parlaient de hausse de taux. Link to comment
Nigel Posted November 9, 2016 Report Share Posted November 9, 2016 Ils ont raison de trembler, l'ennemi prioritaire n'est plus la Russie dorénavant, mais eux. Donc si ils espéraient faire les cons en Mer de Chine, ils vont vite se détendre. Link to comment
Adrian Posted November 20, 2016 Report Share Posted November 20, 2016 La Chine s’érige en championne du libre-échange face au protectionnisme de Trump Link to comment
Nigel Posted November 20, 2016 Report Share Posted November 20, 2016 C'est pas Gattaz qui avait fait une sortie ridicule sur la Chine libérale et la France communiste ? Non car c'est bien sur ce forum quand on trolle, mais c'est pas très sérieux... Link to comment
Adrian Posted November 20, 2016 Report Share Posted November 20, 2016 Si c'est Gattaz Link to comment
Sanson Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 http://www.lemonde.fr/climat/article/2016/11/28/la-chine-prete-a-investir-460-milliards-d-euros-dans-des-centrales-a-charbon-qu-elle-n-utilisera-pas_5039240_1652612.html Cette surcapacité s’explique par le désir des gouvernements locaux de maintenir l’emploi, même si de grands groupes miniers survivent en grande partie grâce au soutien financier de l’Etat. J'avoue, je critiquerai plus jamais la politique économique française. Link to comment
Tramp Posted December 12, 2016 Report Share Posted December 12, 2016 Où l'on apprend que le marxisme n'est pas une idéologie occidentale : Le Monde.fr - Le président chinois veut (encore) plus de Marx à l’université Le président chinois, Xi Jinping, a exhorté le Parti communiste à renforcer son influence idéologique sur les étudiants, rapporte l’agence de presse Chine nouvelle. http://www.lemonde.fr/campus/article/2016/12/12/le-president-chinois-veut-encore-plus-de-marx-a-l-universite_5047641_4401467.html Link to comment
Stephdumas Posted December 16, 2016 Report Share Posted December 16, 2016 "Pékin, on a un problème". http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-16/china-suffers-failed-bill-auction One day after China's regulator halted trading in bond futures for the first time ever, Beijing suffered another catalytic bond-market event overnight when it failed to sell all the Treasury Bills on auction Friday, for the first time in almost 18 months, as bids fell short of minimum requirements, according to traders required to bid at the auction. As BBG reported overnight, the Ministry of Finance sold only 9.57 billion yuan ($1.38 billion) of 182-day bills in a planned 10 billion yuan sale, and 10.85 billion yuan of 91-day notes in a planned 12 billion yuan sale, according to a statement from the bond clearing house. What is notable, is that the Bills on offer paid a hefty yield: the 182-day bills sold for 2.9565%, while the 91-day bills sold for 2.8991%. In other words mainland bond traders are concerned that short-term China rates could spike substantially in the next 3-6 months. Link to comment
Hugh Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 http://www.bbc.com/news/business-38497997 "China has launched a direct rail freight service to London, as part of its drive to develop trade and investment ties with Europe" The train will take about two weeks to cover the 12,000 mile journey and is carrying a cargo of clothes, bags and other household items. It has the advantage of being cheaper than air freight and faster than sea. London will become the 15th European city to join what the Chinese government calls the New Silk Route. The service will pass through Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Poland, Germany Belgium and France before arriving at Barking Rail Freight Terminal in East London, which is directly connected to the High Speed 1 rail line to the European mainland. Link to comment
Stephdumas Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 La Chine a un problème de smog et pollution. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/millions-china-learn-live-smog-airpocalypse-n703911 Le vloggeur Styxhexenhammer666 a posté un vlogue sur le sujet. Link to comment
FabriceM Posted January 11, 2017 Report Share Posted January 11, 2017 The so-called Exorbitant Privilege of the United States, the power to conjure the world’s primary reserve currency, is reflected in the unique combination of being deeply in debt to the rest of the world (that is, having a massive negative net international investment position, or NIIP) while earning far more income abroad than it pays out in interest (that is, having massive positive annual net investment income, or NII). The U.S. NIIP averaged negative $7.5 trillion over FY15/16, while its NII was positive $167 billion, as shown in the top left of the graphic below. Basically, foreigners are willing to accept a trivial return to hold dollar-denominated assets.Far less well known is the mirror-image of the Exorbitant Privilege, or what we might call the Exorbitant Detriment.It is, not surprisingly, borne by China. It is, to some extent, the price the country bears as the world’s largest holder of dollar-denominated central bank reserves. Reserves account for half of China’s foreign assets, of which around 40 percent are invested in low-yielding U.S. Treasury securities. But it also reflects the fact that China is lending to the rest of the world at paltry rates. Chinese government institutions lend to Chinese, as well as foreign, firms operating abroad far more cheaply than alternative lenders [6]. This reflects the Chinese government’s efforts both to subsidize its companies and to strengthen economic ties with resource-rich countries in, for example, Africa and Latin America. China’s Exorbitant Detriment is reflected in an NIIP of $1.6 trillion and NII of negative $80 billion in FY15/16.Can China continue supporting its Exorbitant Detriment indefinitely?Not if it wants to prioritize a halt to reserve sales, which have been necessitated by capital outflows. Negative investment income reduces the current account surplus, and therefore the amount of capital that can leave the country before the central bank has to match outflows with reserve sales. If China’s investment income balance had been zero over FY15/16 it would, all else being equal, have been able to absorb an additional $80 billion of capital outflows before having to sell reserves. This is equivalent to 17 percent of the actual decline in reserves over this period. China’s reserves fell to $3 trillion in December and, as we pointed out in an earlier post [7], could actually fall to what the IMF reserve-analysis rubric would deem dangerously low levels by summer if outflows continue at the pace seen over the last three months. China can slow this decline by demanding higher returns on its lending abroad, but this will require sacrificing its efforts to subsidize its companies as well as those aimed at putting dollars to the service of geostrategic objectives. China’s Exorbitant Detriment, Mirror Image of America’s Exorbitant Privilege, Is Costing It Dearly Le graph est très intéressant, bien au delà du seul cas de la Chine. Link to comment
Stephdumas Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 Un vlogue mentionne la possible présence miltaire ou policier de la Chine en Afghanistan. Link to comment
RaHaN Posted April 21, 2017 Report Share Posted April 21, 2017 http://www.rfi.fr/asie-pacifique/20170421-chine-guo-wengui-milliardaire-fait-trembler-cadres-pcc-etats-unis-interpol Citation Depuis que Meng Hongwei, le numéro 2 de la sécurité publique en Chine a été nommé à la tête d'Interpol, de nombreuses ONG et associations des droits de l'homme remettent en cause l'indépendance de l'organisation vis-à-vis du pouvoir chinois. voir ici aussi :https://www.letemps.ch/monde/2017/04/21/lhomme-daffaires-affole-chine Link to comment
FabriceM Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Et encore une couche de répression des minorités en chine ... http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2017/04/26/au-xinjiang-saddam-et-mohamed-ne-sont-plus-en-odeur-de-saintete_1565517 Citation C’est la dernière mesure kafkaïenne qui nous parvient du Xinjiang, cette province semi-désertique de l’ouest de la Chine, majoritairement musulmane, sous la forme d’une liste de 29 «prénoms de minorité ethnique interdits» diffusée aux bureaux d’état civil. Selon cette circulaire délivrée par les autorités locales, et rendue publique par le Congrès mondial ouïghour, organisation pacifiste basée en Allemagne, les bébés baptisés «Jihad», «Coran» mais aussi «Saddam», «Mohamed» ou «Arafat» ne se verront pas délivrer de «hukou», ce certificat d’enregistrement qui permet d’accéder à l’éducation ou aux services de santé chinois. Depuis le début de l’année, sous couvert de lutte contre le terrorisme islamique, un phénomène inquiétant mais très marginal, c’est une avalanche d’interdictions et d’humiliations qui tombent sur la tête des 20 millions d’habitants de la province. La moitié d’entre eux sont d’ethnie ouïghoure, peuple d’Asie centrale traditionnellement musulman Il y a deux semaines, un article du Global Times un média officiel du Parti communiste chinois, se faisait l’écho de la «rétrogradation d’un membre du Parti pour timidité dans sa lutte contre l’extrémisme religieux». Le crime de Jelil Matniyaz, chef d’une section villageoise du PCC ? «N’avoir pas osé fumer en présence de personnalités religieuses, alors que comme cadre du PCC, il devrait conduire la lutte contre les pensées extrémistes.» Une de ses consœurs, Salamet Memetimin, a, elle, été démise de son poste pour avoir organisé sa cérémonie de mariage chez elle et «non dans un bâtiment officiel». Désormais, les citoyens du Xinjiang peuvent se faire arrêter car ils portent une «barbe anormale», ont écrit le mot «halal» sur leur devanture,ou«refusé de suivre les programmes officiels de radio et de télévision» – sachant que beaucoup d’Ouïghours ne comprennent même pas le mandarin. Une manière de réprimer toute revendication d’indépendance, même pacifique, et d’accélérer l’assimilation forcée de la population. Link to comment
Tramp Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Tu m'étonnes qu'ils posent des bombes Link to comment
Jukebox Posted May 16, 2017 Report Share Posted May 16, 2017 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative Les chinois ont lancé le premier sommet pour leur initiative OBOR (one belt one road) (=new silk road) il y a quelques jours avec notamment la Russie. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-silkroad-finance-idUSKCN18B0YS Link to comment
Jukebox Posted May 19, 2017 Report Share Posted May 19, 2017 Xi Jinping aurait menacé Duterte d'entrer en conflit armé s'il cherchait du pétrole sur un territoire que la Chine réclame. Link to comment
Wayto Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 Je tombe de haut concernant la dette chinoise... Link to comment
Tramp Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 China's broadcast regulator, tightening control of content, promotes 'core socialist values'http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-china-regulator-broadcast-idUKKBN18U08B Mais au moins, ils soutiennent l'accord de Paris eux. Link to comment
Jukebox Posted June 7, 2017 Report Share Posted June 7, 2017 La Chine a, il y a quelques mois, lancé un projet : China Manufacturing 2025, qui consiste à mettre à jour l'industrie chinoise en améliorant notamment le transfert des hautes technologies des entreprises européennes vers les entreprises chinoises. En retour, les européens bénéficieraient d'un accès accru au marché. On peut également voir l'hypocrisie chinoise habituelle : ils disent que ça libérera l'économie alors qu'en réalité, l'Etat continuera à la diriger. http://www.europeanchamber.com.cn/en/china-manufacturing-2025 (un pdf de la chambre de commerce de l'UE en Chine sur ce projet, plutôt intéressant). Link to comment
Dardanus Posted June 23, 2017 Report Share Posted June 23, 2017 Une fois n'est pas coutume, un article très drôle dans le Figaro sur les pandas http://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2017/06/22/01008-20170622ARTFIG00360-cinq-raisons-de-mepriser-les-pandas.php 3 Link to comment
Jukebox Posted June 23, 2017 Report Share Posted June 23, 2017 4 hours ago, Dardanus said: Une fois n'est pas coutume, un article très drôle dans le Figaro sur les pandas http://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2017/06/22/01008-20170622ARTFIG00360-cinq-raisons-de-mepriser-les-pandas.php Je ne connaissais pas l'anecdote avec VGE, c'est plutôt drôle. Link to comment
NoName Posted June 23, 2017 Report Share Posted June 23, 2017 Il y a 14 heures, Dardanus a dit : Une fois n'est pas coutume, un article très drôle dans le Figaro sur les pandas http://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2017/06/22/01008-20170622ARTFIG00360-cinq-raisons-de-mepriser-les-pandas.php La vache, on dirait un article de Buzzfeed. Link to comment
Jukebox Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 http://bilaterals.org/?china-open-to-free-trade-agreement La Chine et le Mexique pourraient commencer des négociations pour un accord de libre-échange. Trump avait notamment affirmé il y a quelques jours que des actions commerciales contre la Chine pourraient être prises car il considère qu'ils ne font pas grand chose sur le sujet nord-coréen. Link to comment
Tortue joviale Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 J'ai du mal a voir un lien logique entre ces deux phrases Link to comment
Stephdumas Posted July 1, 2017 Report Share Posted July 1, 2017 Kyle Bass, un analyste économique et politique, parle de changement tectonique sur la relation USA-Chine. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-30/china-faces-its-comeuppance-kyle-bass-warns-tectonic-shift-us-relationship Citation Bass began by highlighting what he calls a "tectonic shift" in US-China relations in the last few days, pointing to two crucial events... 1. Things changed drastically when US launched unilateral sanctions on China over North Korea... "Xi is a control freak and he absolutely doesn't appreciate the United States acting unilaterally" 2. Things escalated when Trump sold $1.4bn in weapons to Taiwan, angering Beijing more as Bass notes: "Taiwan was the one area which Beijing has asked Trump to stay away from during his meeting at Mar-a-Lago." "Since the death of Otto Warmbier, any chance of meetings with North Korea are now off.. and our diplomatic relationship with China took a major step for the worse yesterday." Bass notes that "China is trying to make marginal changes in its balance of trade with US - buying beef once again and importing a lot more crude oil from the US." But then Bass shifts to the potentially even more precarious situation under the hood of China's economy. As Reuters reports, China's leaders want the restructuring of their massive non-performing loans problem to address financial risks while avoiding big employee lay-offs, and have instigated 'cure by committee'... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now